Tuesday 26 November 2019

Australia’s Proposed Nuclear Climate Change Landscape

Based on the last proposed legislation-However, these images do not include all of the 26 new proposed reactor sites and the additional 18 Nuclear waste “Treatment” plants(dump sites)

Greenhouse Science Flawed by Nuclear Climate Agenda

Greenhouses make things grow lush - The original green house gasses were water vapour made heavy and dark with, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride and lead which caused acid rain and a “hole in the ozone layer” not the other way around. The Kyoto protocol reversed this basic science and tried to tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is mostly co2 not 70% nitrogen. Without the primary greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere  & water vapour, the average temperature of Earth's surface would drop to about −18 °C (0 °F), at night rather than the present average of 15 °C (59 °F) & soar during the day!

What we are experiencing sounds more like the lack there-of .....Doesn’t it to you too?
So why the misinformation?
The Nuclear agenda!!1!
Ever heard of the “Nuclear Winter Effect” and how that will deviate the environment?
How can we forget this? It was the premises for the Matrix movies : ) !!!

On the basis of common sense - carbon in the atmosphere makes things cooler not hotter -it makes clouds form- carbon, neither CO2 or C6 carbon particles, has EVER been green house gas’ as one shower of rain and they are gone - they sit low in the atmosphere and are localised and cannot trap heat globally- additionally carbon in the atmosphere causes rain..... the original greenhouse effect was “Theorised” to be caused by “lead” (Pb)pollutants in the atmosphere- that’s why we switched to unleaded petrols - Remember - Why are all the oldies suffering amnesia on this issue???- Is it too hard to think and remember basic high-school science?

Think of the drug companies who employ scientist to”prove” that poison is not poisonous all the time - that is why there needs to be peer review from outside of their conclave - by non-agendaed scientists - so why are the non-agendaed scientists being derided when they find different results???
The hidden Nuclear agenda in the proposed climate legislation- 26 reactors proposed for Australia alone - and the UN wants Australia to “manage” all the nuclear waste from the rest of the whole world too.!

PLEASE SHARE debate and discuss this - but please make others aware of the Nuclear climate agenda.

Monday 18 November 2019

Carbon is not the Climate Change Issue Nuclear is the Climate Change Issue

With a 98% increase in child suicides our children are being sacrificed to a battle between the Uranium Companies (anti carbon emissions and major media share holders) and oil, gas and coal (pro carbon emissions) - 
This media crud is distracting away from what is really happening here - The pro climate change laws are a vote for a nuclear future - and that policy did not serve Fukushima with the best nuclear technology int he world-

This is about the giving up of choice to governments. We do not want uranium powered future - Millions marched against that less than 2 decades ago - now they hide their agenda under propaganda against their biggest opposition - Coal and Oil companies.

Environmental solutions will only come from unbiased examination of what is happening from all angles not just from one fanatical viewpoint. Myopia will not provide solutions.

If you love your children then tell them to keep reasoning and not swallow unthinking crap  & PLEASE SHARE in the hope that you can wake up some people  - and that the children will know that we have battled to save their futures all of our lives - We have marched and we have protested and just when we thought it was safe the media plays a “Swordfish” style distraction trick - Look at carbon - whilst we usher in Uranium - PLease read the legislations and you will realize how you are being manipulated and how they are trying to use our children against their own better interests -  and we don’t want to see their rights taken away because chicken little is running around saying the sky is falling -

Take your children outside look up at the sky and tell them that we have been here a long time and so will their grand children - Then take your children inside - hug them and let them know that hey are loved - and that you will continue to fight for their freedoms regardless of how fanatical people in the world wish to put a tax upon the air they breathe and want to truly devastate the environment by irradiating it.

All we have to do is say “NO” and see the manipulation for what it is -
 -Neither is the right way -
The solution is the middle way - the gentle way - Plant more trees and make each house green energy self-sufficient - then we cannot be  manipulated by Power Companies

List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Nearly all publishing climate scientists (97–98%[1]) support the consensus on anthropogenic climate change.[3][4] The cscientific consensus is that the global average surface temperature has risen over the past century. Scientists from other fields disagree.  Scientific opinion on climate change was summarized in the 2001 Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The main conclusions on global warming at that time were as follows:

  1. The global average surface temperature has risen 0.6 ± 0.2 °C since the late 19th century, and 0.17 °C per decade in the years 1971–2001.[dead link][5]
  2. "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities", in particular emissions of the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane.[dead link][6]
  3. If greenhouse gas emissions continue the warming will also continue, with temperatures projected to increase by 1.4 °C to 5.8 °C between 1990 and 2100.[A] Accompanying this temperature increase will be increases in some types of extreme weather and a projected sea level rise.[dead link][7] The balance of impacts of global warming become significantly negative at larger values of warming.[dead link][8]
These findings are recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized nations;[9] the consensus has strengthened over time[10] and is now virtually unanimous.[11] The level of consensus correlates with expertise in climate science.[12]
There have been several efforts to compile lists of dissenting scientists, including a 2008 US senate minority report,[13] the Oregon Petition,[14] and a 2007 list by the Heartland Institute,[15] all three of which have been criticized on a number of grounds.[16][17][18]
For the purpose of this list, a "scientist" is defined as an individual who has published at least one peer-reviewed research article in the broad field of natural sciences, although not necessarily in a field relevant to climatology. Since the publication of the IPCC Third Assessment Report, each has made a clear statement in his or her own words (as opposed to the name being found on a petition, etc.) disagreeing with one or more of the report's three main conclusions, and each has been described in reliable sources as a climate skeptic, denier, or in disagreement with any of the three main conclusions. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles. Few of the statements in the references for this list are part of the peer-reviewed scientific literature; most are from other sources such as interviews, opinion pieces, online essays and presentations.
Nota bene: Only individuals who have their own Wikipedia article may be included in the list.

Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections

These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for temperature and sea-level rise over the 21st century. They may not conclude specifically that the current IPCC projections are either too high or too low, but that the projections are likely to be inaccurate due to inadequacies of current global climate modeling.
  • Ivar Giaever, Norwegian–American physicist and Nobel laureate in physics (1973).[37]
  • Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University.[38][39]

Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes

Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variabilityozone changes, and volcanicemissions.[83]
These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes, rather than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown

These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences

These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.

Deceased scientists

These scientists published material indicating their opposition to the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming prior to their deaths.

See also


  1. ^ In its 2007 assessment report, IPCC projected likely temperature rise for various hypothetical levels of future greenhouse gas emissions, known as "emissions scenarios". They reported that during the 21st century the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 1.1 to 2.9 °C (2.0 to 5.2 °F) for the lowest emissions scenario used in the report, and 2.4 to 6.4 °C (4.3 to 11.5 °F) for the highest.[200]
  2. ^ The compilation criteria for including scientists in the list is that they are relevant enough to have their own Wikipedia article, according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines.


  1. Jump up to: a b c Anderegg, William R L; Prall, James W.; Harold, Jacob; Schneider, Stephen H. (2010). "Expert credibility in climate change"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107 (27): 12107–9. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712107Adoi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107PMC 2901439PMID 20566872(i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
  2. ^ Doran, Peter T.; Zimmerman, Maggie Kendall (January 20, 2009). "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF)Eos90 (3): 22–23. Bibcode:2009EOSTr..90...22Ddoi:10.1029/2009EO030002. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 6, 2015.
  3. ^ Doran, Peter; Zimmerman, Maggie (January 20, 2009). "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Eos90 (3): 22–23. Bibcode:2009EOSTr..90...22Ddoi:10.1029/2009EO030002.
  4. ^ John Cook; et al. (April 2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002Cdoi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
  5. ^ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis p.5 – IPCC
  6. ^ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis p.7 – IPCC
  7. ^ Climate Change 2001: Archived December 31, 2007, at the Wayback MachineWorking Group I: The Scientific Basis p.8 – IPCC
  8. ^ Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability p.958 – IPCC ArchivedJune 23, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  9. ^ "Joint Science Academies' Statement" (PDF). Retrieved August 9, 2010.
  10. ^ Reusswig, Fritz (August 21, 2013). "History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming". Environmental Research Letters8 (3): 031003. Bibcode:2013ERL.....8c1003Rdoi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031003Both methods—abstract analysis and self-rating of authors—additionally demonstrate that scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) has been growing in the covered period (1991–2011).
  11. ^ Powell, James L (March 2016). "Climate Scientists Virtually Unanimous Anthropogenic Global Warming Is True"Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society35 (5–6): 121–124. doi:10.1177/0270467616634958.
  12. ^ Cook, John (April 2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002Cdoi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
  13. ^ Morano, Marc (December 11, 2008). "U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims"Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
  14. ^ "Global Warming Petition Project". Retrieved March 2, 2014.
  15. ^ 500 Scientists Whose Research Contradicts Man-Made Global Warming Scares, by Dennis T. Avery. From the Heartland Institute website; published September 14, 2007, accessed June 20, 2008.
  16. ^ Kaufman, Leslie (April 9, 2009). "Dissenter on Warming Expands His Campaign"New York Times.
  17. ^ McKnight, David (August 2, 2008). "The climate change smokescreen"Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved December 28, 2009.
  18. ^ Grandia, Kevin (July 22, 2009). "The 30,000 Global Warming Petition Is Easily-Debunked Propaganda"Huffington Post. Retrieved March 2, 2014.
  19. ^ Paltridge, Garth (2009). the Climate CaperConnor Court PublishingISBN 978-1-921421-25-9There are good and straightforward scientific reasons to believe that the burning of fossil fuel and consequent increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide will lead to an increase in the average temperature of the world above that which would otherwise be the case. Whether the increase will be large enough to be noticeable is still an unanswered question.
  20. ^ Bolt, Andrew (February 12, 2010). "Warmists are hot under the collar as scepticism rules"Herald Sun. Retrieved November 1, 2014.
  21. ^ B.J. Wilson, S.J. Crockford, J.W. Johnson, R.S. Malhi, B.M. Kempae (August 5, 2011), "Genetic and archaeological evidence for a former breeding population of Aleutian Cackling Goose (Branta hutchinsii leucopareia) on Adak Island, central Aleutians, Alaska", Canadian Journal of Zoology89 (8): 732–743, doi:10.1139/z11-027
  22. ^ "Climate denier blogs ignore sea ice and polar bear science, study finds". November 29, 2017. Retrieved September 16, 2018.
  23. ^ Susan J. Crockford, ICCC12-(Panel 3A Fossil Fuels and the Environment)I am here today to give you an example of the failed science that is used to convince uninformed people that burning fossil fuels has had and will continue to have harmful effects on the planet.
  24. ^ "Global Warming: IPCC Reviews & Critiques" page on Ross McKitrick's website.
  25. ^ McKitrick, Ross R., Stephen McIntyre and Chad Herman (2010) "Panel and Multivariate Methods for Tests of Trend Equivalence in Climate Data Sets". Atmospheric Science Lettersdoi:10.1002/asl.290.
  26. ^ A.R. Lucas & P.A. Moore, The Utah Controversy: A Case Study of Public Participation in Pollution ControlNatural Resources Journal Vol. 36, Pages 46-47, 1973
  27. ^ Jacqueline Echevarria, Greenpeace Co-founder: CO2 does not cause global warmingEnergy live News, October 15, 2015
  28. ^ Patrick Moore, Obama’s Half-Baked Alaska: Yes, the glacier of Glacier Bay is receding—as it has from time to time for centuriesThe Wall Street Journal, September 3, 2015
  29. ^ "Denis Rancourt on climate science and on climate politics"Climate Guy Blog, February 23, 2014
  30. ^ Cockburn, A., "Dissidents Against Dogma"The Nation, 25 June 2007.
  31. ^ "Inhofe reveals how scientists and activists believe global warming has ‘co-opted’ the environmental movement," US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, 26 October 2007 [1]
  32. ^ Newton, David E. (2014). Science and Political Controversy: A Reference HandbookABC-CLIO. p. 156. ISBN 978-1610693196.
  33. ^ "Breaking Global Warming Taboos: 'I Feel Duped on Climate Change'"Spiegel Online. February 8, 2012. Retrieved February 19, 2014CO2 alone will never cause a warming of more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the century. Only with the help of supposed amplification effects, especially water vapor, do the computers arrive at a drastic temperature increase.
  34. ^ Delingpole, James (June 16, 2012). "It's no wonder the world's cooling on climate change"Daily Mail. Retrieved November 1, 2014leading German green - former activist and Hamburg state environment senator Prof Fritz Vahrenholt. The evidence for man-made global warming is looking shakier by the day, Germany's answer to Jonathon Porritt or George Monbiot admitted. Far more likely a culprit is the sun.
  35. ^ Tennekes, Hendrik. "A Skeptical View of Climate Models" (PDF)The blind adherence to the harebrained idea that climate models can generate 'realistic' simulations of climate is the principal reason why I remain a climate skeptic.
  36. ^ Timmer, Edwin (February 13, 2010). "Het Gelijk Van Henk Tennekes" (in Dutch). De Telegraaf. Retrieved November 1, 2014.
  37. ^ Drollete, Dan Jr. "Brian Schmidt: Climate change is a real, existential threat that should be dealt with immediately," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 11 ov. 2016. Retrieved 8 July 2017. Brian Schmidt said, "He [Giaever] strongly believes that whatever is occurring [with regard to climate change] is not attributable to emissions of greenhouse gases."
  38. ^ Koonin, Steven (September 2014). "Climate Science Is Not Settled". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 13, 2014[Many open questions] are not ″minor″ issues to be ″cleaned up″ by further research. Rather, they are deficiencies that erode confidence in the computer projections. [...They are] fundamental challenges to our understanding of human impacts on the climate, and they should not be dismissed with the mantra that 'climate science is settled.' While the past two decades have seen progress in climate science, the field is not yet mature enough to usefully answer the difficult and important questions being asked of it.
  39. ^ "Turn down heat on climate debate". Tampa Tribune. September 23, 2014.
  40. ^ Nils-Axel Mörner (March 30, 2005), Economics of Climate Change: 12-ii Session 2005–06 Evidence to Select Committee on Economic AffairsII, The Stationery Office, p. 269, ISBN 9780104007167In conclusion, observational data do not support the sea level rise scenario. On the contrary, they seriously contradict it.
  41. ^ Kelly, Jack. "The facts don't add up for human-caused global warming"Pittsburgh Post-Gazetteprominent skeptics...Nils-Axel Mörner
  42. ^ Peter Stilbs & Åke Ortmark (January 12, 2014), Expressen, gå inte på klimatbluffenIPCC gör ingen egen forskning, utan söker som grupp stöd för en given hypotes - att koldioxiden har en avgörande betydelse för jordens framtida klimat. Detta är egentligen ogörligt, då ingen ännu har klarlagt klimatsystemets naturliga variationer. Enligt de vetenskapliga principer som växt fram under hundratals år tyder de senaste 20 årens observationer snarare på att hypotesen är falsk. (Own translation to English: The IPCC does not make its own research, but is a group searching for a given hypothesis – that carbon dioxide is crucial for the earth’s future climate. This is actually impossible since nobody has yet clarifed the climate system’s natural variability. According to the scientific principles that have developed over hundreds of years, the last 20 years of observations rather indicate that the hypothesis is false.)
  43. ^ "Enögt fokus på CO2-utsläpp leder fel" (in Swedish). Göteborgs-Posten. February 1, 2012. Retrieved November 1, 2014.
  44. ^ Global Warming? What a load of poppycock! by David Bellamy, Daily Mail 9 July 2004.
  45. ^
  46. ^ Monbiot, George (May 10, 2005), Junk Science, London:, retrieved November 7, 2008
  47. ^ Bellamy, David (May 29, 2005), In an Adverse Climate, London: Times Online, retrieved November 7, 2008
  48. ^ Wills Robinson (15 May 2014).Climate change scientist claims he has been forced from new job. Daily Mail.
  49. ^ Axel Bojanowski (May 12, 2014). Climate Change Debate: A Famous Scientist Becomes a Skeptic. Spiegel Online International.
  50. ^ "Episode 102 - Sputnik"Russia Today, 12 December 2015.
  51. ^ Corbyn, P. R. (1967). "The Size and Shape of Pebbles on Chesil Beach". The Geographical Journal133 (1): 54–55. doi:10.2307/1794365JSTOR 1794365.
  52. ^
  53. ^ Journal), Ana Rivas (The Wall Street. "No Need to Panic About Global Warming"
  54. ^ Global Warming Is Not A Crisis, March 12, 2007, It is claimed, on the basis of computer models, that this should lead to 1.1 – 6.4 C warming. What is rarely noted is that we are already three-quarters of the way into this in terms of radiative forcing, but we have only witnessed a 0.6 (+/-0.2) C rise, and there is no reason to suppose that all of this is due to humans.
  55. ^ Glasse, Jennifer (December 5, 2009). "UN Panel to Investigate Claims Climate Change Scientists Suppressed Data"Voice of America. Retrieved November 1, 2014Philip Stott, a professor in biogeography at the University of London and a climate change skeptic
  56. ^ Curry, Judith A.; Webster, Peter J. (2011). "Climate Science and the Uncertainty Monster". Bureau of the American Meteorological Society175 (12): 1667–1682. Bibcode:2011BAMS...92.1667Cdoi:10.1175/2011BAMS3139.1.
  57. ^ Curry, Judith A. (November 17, 2010). "Statement to the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of the United States House of Representatives" (PDF). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  58. ^ Curry, Judith A. (April 25, 2013). "Statement to the Subcommittee on Environment of the United States House of Representatives" (PDF). Retrieved October 25, 2014[The IPCC AR4] estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity is not easily reconciled with recent forcing estimates and observational data. There is increasing support for values of climate sensitivity around or below 2°C.
  59. ^ Mann, Michael E. (October 17, 2014). "Curry Advocates Against Action on Climate Change". Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  60. ^ "Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, U.Va. | Faculty".
  61. ^ Michaels, Patrick J.; Knappenberger, Paul C.; Frauenfeld, Oliver W.; Davis, Robert E. (2002). "Revised 21st century temperature projections". Climate Research23 (1): 1–9. Bibcode:2002ClRes..23....1Mdoi:10.3354/cr023001JSTOR 24868330.
  62. ^
  63. ^ D'Aleo, Joseph. "The Storm of February" (PDF)National Weather Digest.
  64. ^ Lovley, Erika (November 25, 2008). "Tracking 'The Gore Effect'".
  65. ^ Nuccitelli, Dana (July 10, 2017). "Conservatives are again denying the very existence of global warming"The Guardian.
  66. ^ D'Aleo, Joseph (December 15, 2009). "Climategate: Something's Rotten in Denmark ... and East Anglia, Asheville, and New York City"The IPCC and their supported scientists have worked to remove the pesky Medieval Warm Period, the Little Ice Age, and the period emailer Tom Wigley referred to as the "warm 1940s blip," and to pump up the recent warm cycle.
  67. ^ Freeman Dyson, in correspondence with editor Steve Connor (February 25, 2011), "Letters to a heretic: An email conversation with climate change sceptic Professor Freeman Dyson"The IndependentFirst, the computer models are very good at solving the equations of fluid dynamics but very bad at describing the real world. [...] Sixth, summing up the other five reasons, the climate of the earth is an immensely complicated system and nobody is close to understanding it.
  68. Jump up to: a b c Epstein, Ethan (January 13, 2014). "What Catastrophe?"The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on December 28, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2018But Lindzen, plainly, is different. He can’t be dismissed. Nor, of course, is he the only skeptic with serious scientific credentials. Judith Curry, the chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech, William Happer, professor of physics at Princeton, John Christy, a climate scientist honored by NASA, now at the University of Alabama, and the famed physicist Freeman Dyson are among dozens of scientists who have gone on record questioning various aspects of the IPCC’s line on climate change. Lindzen, for his part, has said that scientists have called him privately to thank him for the work he’s doing
  69. ^ "The Climate Science Isn't Settled"The Wall Street Journal Online, November 30, 2009, Claims that climate change is accelerating are bizarre. [...] The quality of the data is poor [...] The general support for warming is based not so much on the quality of the data, but rather on the fact that there was a little ice age from about the 15th to the 19th century.
  70. ^ "What Catastrophe?"The Weekly Standard, January 13, 2014, archived from the original on December 28, 2017
  71. ^ Zedillo, Ernesto, ed. (2008). Global Warming: Looking Beyond Kyoto. Brookings Institution Press. pp. 21–. ISBN 978-0-8157-9716-6.
  72. ^ Loehle, Craig (2004). "Climate change: detection and attribution of trends from long-term geologic data". Ecological Modelling171 (4): 433–450. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.08.013.
  73. ^ Carter, Bob (January 20, 2009). "Facts debunk global warming alarmism"The Australian. Retrieved May 11, 2014.
  74. ^ Loehle, Craig (2007). "A 2000 Year Global Temperature Reconstruction based on Non-Tree ring Proxies" (PDF)Energy & Environment18 (7 & 8): 1049–1058. doi:10.1260/095830507782616797.
  75. ^ Milloy, Steven (November 21, 2007). "U.N. Climate Distractions"Fox News Channel. Retrieved February 13, 2014A new temperature reconstruction for the past 2,000 years created by Craig Loehle of the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement indicates that, 1,000 years ago, globally averaged temperature was about 0.3 degrees Celsius warmer than the current temperature.
  76. ^ Singer, S. Fred (January 9, 2010). "Index of Editorials Global Warming Junkscience"Science and Environmental Policy Project. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  77. ^ "Skeptics, unite!"National Post. March 30, 2010. Archived from the original on March 22, 2014. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  78. ^ Loehle, Craig; McCulloch, J. Huston (2008). "Correction to: A 2000-Year Global Temperature Reconstruction Based on Non-Tree Ring Proxies". Energy & Environment19(1): 93–100. doi:10.1260/095830508783563109.
  79. ^ No Need to Panic About Global Warming. Wall Street Journal, January 27, 2012.
  80. ^ Phil Plait. "No Need to Worry About Global Warming, Folks: More Carbon Dioxide Will Be Awesome," Salon, 10 May 2013. Retrieved 8 July 2017. Plait wrote, "He [Schmitt] has a long history of flat-out denial of global warming."
  81. ^ Roberts, John (September 30, 2013). "UN's massive new climate report adds little explanation for 'pause' in warming"Fox News Channel. Retrieved October 10, 2014“I know that the models are not adequate,” Tsonis told Fox News. “There are a lot of climate models out there. They don’t agree with each other – and they don’t agree with reality.”
  82. ^ Lee Bergquist & Thomas Content (March 25, 2009). "Natural forces stalling global warming, UWM pair say". Retrieved November 1, 2014The findings of mathematicians Kyle L. Swanson and Anastasios Tsonis contradict the assumptions of many climate scientists... who say the planet is currently warming.
  83. ^ Meehl, G.A.; W.M. Washington; C.A. Ammann; J.M. Arblaster; T.M.L. Wigleym; C. Tebaldi (2004). "Combinations of Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings in Twentieth-Century Climate" (PDF)Journal of Climate17 (19): 3721–3727Bibcode:2004JCli...17.3721Mdoi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3721:CONAAF>2.0.CO;2.
  84. ^ William KininmonthClimate Change: A Natural Hazard (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on August 28, 2007, retrieved August 26, 2011Natural variability of the climate system has been underestimated by IPCC and has, to now, dominated human influences.
  85. ^ Shand, Adam (January 10, 2013). "Heat likely to return despite southerlies - NATURE'S FURY -"The Australian. Retrieved October 31, 2014William Kininmonth, a noted climate change sceptic  (Subscription required.)
  86. ^ Melissa Fyfe, "Cool reception for new green group", The Age, 8 June 2005.
  87. ^ "Research pair suggest global warming almost completely natural (Update)".
  88. ^ "Wild weather ignites climate change debate"Lateline. Australian Broadcasting Company. August 15, 2002. Natural climate changes occur unrelated to carbon dioxide contents.
  89. ^ Manning, Paddy (November 26, 2012). "Roy Hill to push through pain"Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved October 31, 2014Mr Plimer, a noted climate sceptic
  90. ^ Coren, Michael (February 13, 2010). "Climatology expert threatened for climate change views"Toronto Sun. Retrieved March 6, 2014There has always been and always will be climate change, but it has very little to do with human activity and has nothing at all to do with pollution of course.
  91. ^ Plumer, Bradford (February 7, 2007). "The dire global cooling problem"The Guardian. Retrieved November 1, 2014global warming-skeptic Timothy Ball
  92. ^ Dyck, M.G.; Soon, W.; Baydack, R.K.; Legates, D.R.; Baliunas, S.; Ball, T.F.; Hancock, L.O. (2007). "Polar bears of western Hudson Bay and climate change: Are warming spring air temperatures the "ultimate" survival control factor" (PDF)Ecological Complexity4(3): 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.03.002.
  93. ^ Ian Clark (March 22, 2004). "Letter to the editor of The Hill Times"Natural Resources Stewardship Project. Archived from the original on February 10, 2009. Retrieved August 26, 2011We know that [the sun] was responsible for climate change in the past, and so is clearly going to play the lead role in present and future climate change. And interestingly... solar activity has recently begun a downward cycle.
  94. ^ Huberman, Joel A. (October 6, 2007). "Skeptics need to be held to scientific standards, too"The Buffalo News. Archived from the original on April 9, 2017. Harris and [Ian] Clark are global warming "skeptics."Retrieved =8 April 2017.
  95. ^ Robinson, Cindy (Spring 2005). "Global warning? Controversy heats up in the scientific community". Carleton University Magazine. Archived from the original on April 19, 2008. Retrieved August 31, 2012There is no global warming due to human anthropogenic activities.
  96. ^ Montgomery, Charles (August 12, 2006). "Nurturing doubt about climate change is big business"The Globe and Mail. Retrieved October 31, 2014Canada's most vocal climate skeptics...University of Ottawa lecturer Tad Murty
  97. ^ Patterson, Timothy (June 2007). "Read the Sunspots". Financial Post.
  98. ^ "He's in the hot seat"Edmonton Journal. September 23, 2007. Retrieved October 31,2014The main driver of climate change, [Tim Patterson] believes, is a combination of solar changes (well-known cycles of the sun's intensity) as well as cosmic rays.
  99. ^ Veizer, Ján (2005). "Celestial Climate Driver: A Perspective from Four Billion Years of the Carbon Cycle"Geoscience Canada. 1. 32. Retrieved August 26, 2012At this stage, two scenarios of potential human impact on climate appear feasible: (1) the standard IPCC model that advocates the leading role of greenhouse gases, particularly of CO
    , and (2) the alternative model that argues for celestial phenomena as the principal climate driver. The two scenarios are likely not even mutually exclusive, but a prioritization may result in different relative impact. Models and empirical observations are both indispensable tools of science, yet when discrepancies arise, observations should carry greater weight than theory. If so, the multitude of empirical observations favours celestial phenomena as the most important driver of terrestrial climate on most time scales, but time will be the final judge.
  100. ^ "Esteemed Ottawa scientist says cosmic rays, not greenhouse gases, cause global warming"Ottawa Citizen. March 16, 2006. Retrieved October 30, 2014.
  101. ^ Svensmark, Henrik (2007). "Cosmoclimatology: a new theory emerges" (PDF)Astronomy & Geophysics48 (1): 18–24. Bibcode:2007A&G....48a..18Sdoi:10.1111/j.1468-4004.2007.48118.x. Retrieved December 19, 2011The case for anthropogenic climate change during the 20th century rests primarily on the fact that concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases increased and so did global temperatures. Attempts to show that certain details in the climatic record confirm the greenhouse forcing (e.g. Mitchell et al. 2001) have been less than conclusive. By contrast, the hypothesis that changes in cloudiness obedient to cosmic rays help to force climate change predicts a distinctive signal that is in fact very easily observed, as an exception that proves the rule.
  102. ^ Nuccitelli, Dana (November 12, 2013). "Cosmic rays fall cosmically behind humans in explaining global warming"The Guardian. Retrieved October 30, 2014Henrik Svensmark of the Danish National Space Institute is the main proponent of the hypothesis linking [comic rays] to global climate change
  103. ^ Article in Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) entitled “Are there connections between the Earth's magnetic field and climate?” by V. Courtillot, Y. Gallet, J.-L. Le Mouël, F. Fluteau, A. Genevey (2007) EPSL 253, 328.
  104. ^ Shaviv, Nir. "Prof Nir Shaviv: The influence of cosmic radiation on the climate!". European Institute for Climate and Energy. Retrieved October 24, 2014The story we hear from the IPCC is faulty in many respects
  105. ^ Taylor, James (May 30, 2013). "Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims"Forbes. Retrieved October 30, 2014prominent, vigorous skeptic... Nir Shaviv
  106. ^ "Google Translate".
  107. ^ "Doug Edmeades: Why I'm a global warming sceptic".
  108. ^ Halfdan Carstens (2013). "Klimatolog i hardt vær". Archived from the original on January 9, 2014. Retrieved January 9, 2014Based on my own observations of how the climate varies naturally, I am skeptical of the CO2 hypothesis (own translation from Norwegian)
  109. ^ Prestrud, Pal (October 18, 2011). "Questionable climate debate" (in Norwegian). Aftenposten. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
  110. ^ "Russian academic says CO2 not to blame for global warming"Russian International News Agency. January 15, 2007. Retrieved August 24, 2012Global warming results not from the emission of greenhouse gases [...], but from an unusually high level of solar radiation and [...] growth in its intensity.
  111. ^ "Change climate change!"Hindustan Times. January 19, 2010. Retrieved November 1, 2014A Russian astronomer named Khabibullo Abdusamatov from St Petersburg has predicted the next ice age will start between 2035 and 2045 due to a decline in solar activity
  112. ^ Wibjörn Karlén (January 7, 2010). "Lilla istiden kan redan vara här". Retrieved January 16, 2014After a long time of studying climate variations, I have come to the conclusion that the space weather suggests that we are more likely heading towards a colder period than a warmer. (own translation from Swedish)
  113. ^ "Skeptics from a range of scientific disciplines get louder in their opposition to doomsday claims"Orange County Register. January 1, 2008. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
  114. ^ Segalstad, Tom. "What is CO
     – friend or foe?"
     (PDF). Retrieved July 4, 2009The IPCC's temperature curve (the so-called 'hockey stick' curve) must be in error [...] All measurements of solar luminosity and 14C isotopes show that there is at present an increasing solar radiation which gives a warmer climate
  115. ^ Stratton, Allegra (November 20, 2009). "Climate change denial MEP attacks church"The Guardian. Retrieved October 30, 2014Tom Segalstad, a Norwegian geologist who says human-released CO2 would not have a large effect on the climate
  116. ^ Baliunas, Sallie (August 2002). "Warming Up to the Truth"The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved August 31, 2012.
  117. ^ Baliunas, Sallie; Willie Soon (August 22, 2002). "Global Warming Science vs. Computer Model Speculation: Just Ask the Experts". Capitalism Magazine. Retrieved August 31,2012[T]he recent warming trend in the surface temperature record cannot be caused by the increase of human-made greenhouse gases in the air.
  118. ^ Rowland, Christopher (November 5, 2013). "Researcher helps sow climate-change doubt"Boston Globe. Retrieved November 1, 2014prominent climate-change doubter, Sallie Baliunas, who was studying variations in solar radiation
  119. ^ Phillip V Brennan (December 10, 2007). "New Study Explodes Human-Global Warming Story". Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved August 26, 2011[...]observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming.
  120. ^ Asten, Michael (December 29, 2009). "More evidence CO2 not culprit"The Australian. Retrieved November 1, 2014.
  121. ^ Easterbrook, Don (October 22–25, 2006). "The Cause of Global Warming and Predictions for the Coming Century"Philadelphia Annual Meeting. Retrieved August 31,2012Because the warming periods in these oscillations [of glaciers] occurred well before atmospheric CO
     began to rise rapidly in the 1940s, they could not have been caused by increased atmospheric CO
    , and global warming since 1900 could well have happened without any effect of CO
    . If the cycles continue as in the past, the current warm cycle should end soon[...]
  122. ^ "The views of retired geology professor Don Easterbrook are considered in the minority". March 26, 2013. Retrieved November 1, warming skeptic who argued that federal scientists have been manipulating climate data to inflate temperatures. The views of retired geology professor Don Easterbrook are considered in the minority.
  123. ^ Raymond Brusca (January 12, 2009). "Professor denies global warming theory"[Global warming] probably has little to do with carbon dioxide, just like past warmings had little to do with carbon dioxide
  124. ^ Legates, David (May 2006). "Climate Science: Climate Change and Its Impacts". National Center for Policy Analysis. Retrieved August 31, 2012About half of the warming during the 20th century occurred prior to the 1940s, and natural variability accounts for all or nearly all of the warming.
  125. ^ Montgomery, Jeff (March 19, 2013). "Climate change skeptics say 'sick' science distorts facts"USA Today. Retrieved October 31, 2014Professor David Legates of the University of Delaware, a former climatologist for the state, bluntly rejected leading climate change claims
  126. ^ Silvey, Janese (March 5, 2012). "Professor details role as climate consultant"Columbia Tribune. Retrieved April 15, 2014There's no doubt the climate is changing; that's a given," he said. "But the question is: What's causing it. Is it mankind alone, which a lot of people say? Is it some mix of man and nature? Or is it nature? I would say nature is mostly responsible. There may be a role for man in there somewhere, but how much, I don't know.
  127. ^ Gerken, James (August 28, 2014). "Utility-Sponsored Teacher Training At Mizzou Brings Climate Skepticism And Anti-EPA Message"The Huffington Post. Retrieved October 31,2014.
  128. ^ Robinson, Arthur B. (1997). "Science Has Spoken: Global Warming is a Myth" (PDF)Dow Jones & Company. Retrieved February 18, 2014we needn't worry about human use of hydrocarbons warming the Earth. We also needn't worry about environmental calamities, even if the current, natural warming trend continues: After all the Earth has been much warmer during the past 3,000 years without ill effects.
  129. ^ Gaston, Christian (August 10, 2013). "Former Peter DeFazio opponent Art Robinson elected to lead Oregon Republican Party"The Oregonian. Retrieved October 31, 2014Robinson, a chemist and outspoken skeptic of human-caused global warming
  130. ^ Bolt, Andrew (August 3, 2011). "New research: warmth produces these carbon dioxide concentrations"Herald Sun. Retrieved April 2, 2014Salby...suggests that its warmth which tends to produce more CO2, rather than vice versa - which, incidentally is the story of the past recoveries from ice ages.
  131. ^ Darwall, Rupert (Summer 2014). "An Unsettling Climate"City Journal (New York City). Retrieved October 30, 2014Another dissenter, the American atmospheric physicist Murry Salby...
  132. ^ "I cambi climatici e le loro cause, una discussione su alcuni punti chiave (Climate Change and Its Causes, A Discussion About Some Key Issues)" (PDF)La Chimica e l'Industria. 2010. pp. 70–75. Retrieved August 31, 2012At least 60% of the warming of the Earth observed since 1970 appears to be induced by natural cycles which are present in the solar system. A climatic stabilization or cooling until 2030–2040 is forecast by the phenomenological model.
  133. ^ "Scafetta webpage".
  134. ^ Taylor, James (May 30, 2013). "Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims"Forbes. Retrieved October 30, 2014prominent, vigorous skeptic... Nicola Scafetta
  135. ^ Singer, S. Fred (April 22, 2005). "'Flat Earth Award' nominee's challenge to Chicken Littles"Christian Science MonitorThe greenhouse effect is real. However, the effect is minute, insignificant, and very difficult to detect.
  136. ^ "The Denial Machine (ABC Interview)". 2008. Archived from the original on April 8, 2014. Hosted here
  137. ^ "Climate of Doubt"PBS Frontline. October 23, 2012.
  138. ^ Mook, Dean (February 8, 2014). "Connecting the dots for climate skeptics"The Roanoke Times. Retrieved October 30, 2014But, there are always skeptics. For one example among several, Fred Singer, retired University of Virginia professor of physics
  139. ^ William J Cromie (April 24, 2003). "Global warming is not so hot: 1003 was worse, researchers find". Harvard University Gazette. Retrieved August 26, 2011there's increasingly strong evidence that previous research conclusions [...] may have been biased by underestimation of natural climate variations.
  140. ^ Rowland, Christopher (November 5, 2013). "Researcher helps sow climate-change doubt"The Boston Globe. Retrieved October 30, 2014Willie Soon is a hero of the skeptical movement
  141. ^ "Testimony of Roy W. Spencer" (PDF)before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. July 22, 2008. Retrieved August 31, 2012I predict that [scientists will realise] most of the climate change we have observed is natural, and that mankind’s role is relatively minor
  142. ^ Bachelard, Michaellast (September 11, 2011). "Majority report: why consensus is all the rage"Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved October 30, 2014Internationally, sceptics look to climatologist Dr Roy Spencer
  143. ^ Tomlinson, Stuart (February 21, 2008). "Update: Controversial "State Climatologist" Steps Aside" Retrieved March 20, 2014Taylor said he believes climate change is a combination of natural factor and human factors. "I don't deny that human activities affect climate change," he said. "But I believe up to now, natural variations have played a more important role than human activities.
  144. ^ Learn, Scott (January 26, 2012). "Presentation by global warming skeptics draws big crowd in Portland"The Oregonian. Retrieved October 30, 2014.
  145. ^ "Climat: la prévention, oui, la peur, non" (in French). L'Express. May 10, 2006. Archived from the original on November 17, 2006. Retrieved August 26, 2011:The increase in the CO
     content of the atmosphere is an observed fact and mankind is most certainly responsible. In the long term, this increase will without doubt become harmful, but its exact role in the climate is less clear. Various parameters appear more important than CO
    . Consider the water cycle and formation of various types of clouds, and the complex effects of industrial or agricultural dust. Or fluctuations of the intensity of the solar radiation on annual and century scale, which seem better correlated with heating effects than the variations of CO
  146. ^ Lean, Geoffrey (June 19, 2009). "Conservatives have always been green"The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved October 30, 2014France's foremost climate sceptic, Claude Allègre
  147. ^ "ZENIT - Global Warming Natural, Says Expert" April 27, 2007. Retrieved August 31, 2012it is not possible to exclude the idea that climate changes can be due to natural causes
  148. ^ Solomon, Lawrence (August 22, 2013). "Lawrence Solomon: Model mockery?"National Post. Retrieved October 28, 2014climate change skeptics such as... Antonino Zichichi
  149. ^ Jacobsen, Siw Ellen (February 29, 2008). "Pål Brekke: Internationally renowned climate sceptic and solar expert". The Research Council of Norway. The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) has determined that the earth's temperature has risen by about 0.7° C since 1901. According to Dr Brekke, this time period coincides not only with an increase in human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, but also with a higher level of solar activity, which makes it complicated to separate the effects of these two phenomena. [...] Dr Brekke has published more than 40 scientific articles on the sun and on the interaction between the sun and the earth. "We could be in for a surprise," he cautions. "It's possible that the sun plays an even more central role in global warming than we have suspected. Anyone who claims that the debate is over and the conclusions are firm has a fundamentally unscientific approach to one of the most momentous issues of our time."
  150. ^ Brekke, Paal (November 16, 2000). "Viewpoint: The Sun and climate change"BBC NewsNatural processes involving changes in the Sun could have at least as powerful an effect on global temperature as increased emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2)...
  151. ^ Syun-Ichi, Akasofu (June 15, 2007). "On the Fundamental Defect in the IPCC's Approach to Global Warming Research by Syun-Ichi Akasofu"Climate Science: Roger Pielke Retrieved August 31, 2012[T]he method of study adopted by the International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) is fundamentally flawed, resulting in a baseless conclusion: Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations. Contrary to this statement ..., there is so far no definitive evidence that 'most' of the present warming is due to the greenhouse effect. ... [The IPCC] should have recognized that the range of observed natural changes should not be ignored, and thus their conclusion should be very tentative. The term 'most' in their conclusion is baseless.
  152. ^ Alford, Peter (March 14, 2009). "Japanese scientists cool on theories"The Australian. Retrieved October 30, 2014Dr Akasofu and Tokyo Institute of Technology geology professor Shigenori Maruyama are highly critical of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's acceptance that hazardous global warming results mainly from man-made gas emissions.
  153. ^ Balling, Robert (September 2003). "The Increase in Global Temperature: What it Does and Does Not Tell Us" (PDF). George C. Marshall Institute. Archived from the original(PDF) on February 22, 2006. [I]t is very likely that the recent upward trend [in global surface temperature] is very real and that the upward signal is greater than any noise introduced from uncertainties in the record. However, the general error is most likely to be in the warming direction, with a maximum possible (though unlikely) value of 0.3 °C. ... At this moment in time we know only that: (1) Global surface temperatures have risen in recent decades. (2) Mid-tropospheric temperatures have warmed little over the same period. (3) This difference is not consistent with predictions from numerical climate models.
  154. ^ Carroll, Vincent (June 20, 2009). "Carroll: Skeptical of climate alarmists"The Denver Post. Retrieved October 30, 2014.
  155. ^ Christy, John R.; Douglass, David H. (2009). "Limits on CO
     Climate Forcing from Recent Temperature Data of Earth"
     (PDF)Energy & Environment20: 177–189. arXiv:0809.0581doi:10.1260/095830509787689277. Retrieved June 17, 2011...the data show a small underlying positive trend that is consistent with CO
     climate forcing with no-feedback. [...] There is disagreement in regard to the validity of the 
    global warming hypothesis that states that there are positive feedback processes leading to gains g that are larger than 1, perhaps as large as 3 or 4. However, recent studies suggest that the values of g is much smaller.
  156. ^ Christy, John (November 1, 2007). "My Nobel Moment"Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 2, 2007...I see neither the developing catastrophe nor the smoking gun proving that human activity is to blame for most of the warming we see. Rather, I see a reliance on climate models (useful but never "proof") and the coincidence that changes in carbon dioxide and global temperatures have loose similarity over time.
  157. ^ Sullivansept, Margaret (September 6, 2014). "Meant as Portraits, Seen as Hagiography"The New York Times. Retrieved October 30, 2014John Christy — a prominent climate-change skeptic
  158. ^ Petr Chylek (April 2002). "A Long Term Perspective on Climate Change" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 29, 2007. Retrieved August 26, 2011Carbon dioxide should not be considered as a dominant force behind the current much of the [temperature] increase can be ascribed to CO
    , to changes in solar activity, or to the natural variability of climate is uncertain
  159. ^ Borenstein, Seth (October 31, 2011). "Noted skeptic finds climate change real"The Journal Gazette. Retrieved October 30, 2014Petr Chylek of Los Alamos National Lab, a noted skeptic
  160. ^ David Deming (December 6, 2006). "U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, Hearing Statements" Archived from the original on January 30, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2012The amount of climatic warming that has taken place in the past 150 years is poorly constrained, and its cause – human or natural – is unknown. There is no sound scientific basis for predicting future climate change with any degree of certainty. If the climate does warm, it is likely to be beneficial to humanity rather than harmful. In my opinion, it would be foolish to establish national energy policy on the basis of misinformation and irrational hysteria.
  161. ^ Davis, Tony (December 6, 2009). "UA prof involved in Climategate replies to critics"Arizona Daily Star. Retrieved October 30, 2014longtime warming skeptic David Deming
  162. ^ Krueger, Curtis. Most urgent hurricane threat? Overdevelopment, not global warming. "The ongoing cycle of greater and lesser hurricane activity is not attributable to man-made global warming, Goldenberg says. In fact, he does not think humans are causing global warming." Tampa Bay Times. 5 July 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2017.
  163. ^ "Stanley Goldenberg ICCC7". June 24, 2013. (3:59) They are making more strides in understanding el nino, but they cannot predict something like that one or two months in advance. And they are wanting me to believe a climate model projecting 50 years, 70 years in advance, enough said on that.
  164. ^ Idso, Craig D.; Idso, Keith E. (1998). "Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming" Archived from the original on February 24, 2007. Retrieved March 16,2014...there is no compelling reason to believe that the rise in temperature was caused by the rise in CO2. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that future increases in the air's CO2 content will produce any global warming; for there are numerous problems with the popular hypothesis that links the two phenomena.
  165. ^ "U.S. House of Representatives Joint Hearing Before the Subcommittee on National Economic Growth, Natural Resources, and Regulatory Affairs of the Committee on Government Reform and the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment of the Committee on Science: Is CO2 a Pollutant and does the EPA Have the Power to Regulate It?" (PDF)United States Government Printing Office. October 6, 1999. Retrieved November 1, 2014.
  166. ^ "Kary B. Mullis - Facts,", Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. Retrieved 9 July 2017.
  167. ^ Wade, Nicholas. "Scientist at Work/Kary Mullis; After the 'Eureka,' a Nobelist Drops Out," The New York Times, 15 Sept. 1998. Retrieved 8 July 2017. One line in Wades long peek into Mullis's life is, "He disputes the arguments that cholorfluorocarbons are depleting the ozone layer and that industrial waste gases may cause the climate to get hotter."
  168. ^ Mullis is known for his unorthodox views on astrology, AIDS, and recreational drugs. Carlson, Peter. "Nobel Chemist Kary Mullis, Making Waves as a Mind Surfer," The Washington Post, 3 Nov. 1998. Retrieved 9 July 2017. "On AIDS and Global Warming"(PDF).
  169. ^ Goklany, Indur M (2005). "A Climate Policy for the Short and Medium Term: Stabilization or Adaptation?". Energy & Environment16 (3–4): 667–680. doi:10.1260/0958305054672420.
  170. ^ Goklany, Indur M (2009). ""Is Climate Change the "Defining Challenge of Our Age?". Energy & Environment20 (3): 279–302. CiteSeerX
  171. ^ Goklany, Indur M., "Discounting the Future", Regulation, 32: 36-40 (Spring 2009).
  172. ^ Craig Idso. "A Science- Based Rebuttal to the Testimony of Al Gore before the United States Senate Environment & Public Works Committee" (PDF)Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change. Retrieved August 26, 2012The rising CO
     content of the air should boost global plant productivity dramatically, enabling humanity to increase food, fiber and timber production and thereby continue to feed, clothe, and provide shelter for their still-increasing numbers ... this atmospheric CO
    -derived blessing is as sure as death and taxes.
  173. ^ Carpenter, Zoë (April 10, 2014). "This Sham Report Is What the Climate Movement Is Up Against?"The Nation. Retrieved October 28, 2014climate change skeptic Craig Idso
  174. ^ Sherwood B. Idso, Craig D. Idso and Keith E. Idso (November 2003). "Enhanced or Impaired? Human Health in a CO2-Enriched Warmer World" (PDF)Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change. p. 30. Retrieved August 26, 2012[W]arming has been shown to positively impact human health, while atmospheric CO
     enrichment has been shown to enhance the health-promoting properties of the food we eat, as well as stimulate the production of more of it. ... [W]e have nothing to fear from increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO
     and global warming.
  175. ^ Gelbspan, Ross (March 22, 2001). "Bush's Global Warmers"The Nation. Retrieved October 28, 2014Sherwood Idso, a longtime coal-sponsored global warming skeptic
  176. ^ Michaels, Patrick (October 16, 2003). "Posturing and Reality on Warming"CATO Institute. Retrieved June 10, 2009Scientists know quite precisely how much the planet will warm in the foreseeable future, a modest three-quarters of a degree (Celsius), plus or minus a mere quarter-degree ... a modest warming is a likely benefit... human warming will be strongest and most obvious in very cold and dry air, such as in Siberia and northwestern North America in the dead of winter.
  177. ^ Gillis, Justin (February 10, 2014). "Freezing Out the Bigger Picture"New York Times. Retrieved October 28, 2014Patrick J. Michaels, a climate skeptic at the Cato Institute
  178. ^ Auer explains why he backs climate science coalition, New Zealand Press Association, April 30, 2006, the global warming argument, particularly with all the disastrous consequences that are being promulgated ... this is all a non-sustainable argument. In other words the facts will, in time, prove them to be wrong
  179. ^ "Global warming debunked"The Timaru Herald. May 19, 2007. Archived from the original on July 14, 2007. Retrieved June 11, 2007.
  180. Jump up to: a b "Wisconsin's Energy Cooperative". May 2007. Archived from the original on July 6, 2010. Retrieved September 1, 2012It's absurd. Of course [temperature's] going up. It has gone up since the early 1800s, before the Industrial Revolution, because we're coming out of the Little Ice Age, not because we're putting more carbon dioxide into the air.
  181. ^ "Is Warming Our Fault?". June 18, 2007. Archived from the original on May 22, 2009. Reid Bryson "is referred to as a global warming skeptic."
  182. ^ McLean, J. D.; de Freitas, C. R.Carter, R. M. (2009). "Influence of the Southern Oscillation on tropospheric temperature" (PDF)Journal of Geophysical Research114(D14): D14104. arXiv:0908.1828Bibcode:2009JGRD..11414104Mdoi:10.1029/2008JD011637.
  183. ^ "A little warming, a lot of hysteria"Washington Times. April 11, 2006. Retrieved November 1, 2014professor [Robert Carter], writing in the London Daily Telegraph, does not dispute the evidence that we're in an era of rising temperatures. Who does? But he suggests that man exhibits considerable hubris—insolence, even—if he imagines that he's responsible.
  184. ^ Chris de Freitas (May 9, 2006). "Chris de Freitas: Evidence must prevail" (PDF)The New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 23, 2006. Retrieved August 26, 2011To support the argument that carbon dioxide is causing [global warming], the evidence would have to distinguish between human-caused and natural warming. This has not been done.
  185. ^ "Half of Kiwis doubt global warming: poll"New Zealand Herald. January 18, 2010. Retrieved November 1, 2014climate sceptic Chris de Freitas
  186. ^ Gray, Vincent R. (April 2008). "The Global Warming Scam" (PDF). Retrieved February 13, 2014.
  187. ^ Barton, Chris (November 4, 2006). "It's hype, hysteria and hot air says climate change nay-sayers"The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  188. ^ Achenbach, Joel (May 28, 2006). "The Tempest"The Washington PostWashington, D.C.WPCISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved September 1, 2012I am of the opinion that [global warming] is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people.
  189. ^ "Hurricane predictor will update forecast Wednesday"The Washington Post. September 27, 2010. Retrieved November 1, 2014Gray – who has gotten attention lately for calling global warming a hoax
  190. ^ "UNEP Sasakawa Prize"United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved April 3,2017.
  191. ^ Izrael, Yuri A. (June 23, 2005). "Climate change: not a global threat"RIA Novosti. Retrieved April 1, 2017there is no proven link between human activity and global warming
  192. ^ "Yuri Antonievich Izrael." Obituary by the World Meteorological Organization. © 2016. Retrieved 3 April 2017.
  193. ^ "The Marshall Institute – Founders". Archived from the original on July 6, 2010. Retrieved April 1, 2012.
  194. ^ Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (1st U.S. ed.). New York: Bloomsbury Press. ISBN 978-1-59691-610-4.
  195. ^ Seitz, F. and Jastrow, R. (Dec 2001) Retrieved July 16, 2010 Do people cause global warming? Archived May 8, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  196. ^ Hal Lewis: My Resignation From The American Physical Society, October 8, 2010, GWPF site (archived copy accessed 12/30/13)
  197. ^ Chodos, Alan, ed. "APS Responds to Member’s Resignation over Climate Change," APS News, Nov. 2010, Vol. 19. No. 10. Retrieved 8 July 2017. Lewis is quoted calling "the global warming scam" a "pseudoscientific fraud."
  198. ^ Seitz, Frederick (December 1, 2001). "Do people cause global warming?". Heartland Institute Environment News. Retrieved August 25, 2012So we see that the scientific facts indicate that all the temperature changes observed in the last 100 years were largely natural changes and were not caused by carbon dioxide produced in human activities.
  199. ^ Hevesi, Dennis. "Frederick Seitz, Physicist Who Led Skeptics of Global Warming, Dies at 96," The New York Times, 6 March 2008. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
  200. ^ WG1. "Chap 10, Executive Summary". IPCC.

Further reading

External links