Monday, 14 August 2017

The Illusion of Loneliness & Separation - Shé D'Montford

She D'Montford Medium Presentation Afterlife Discussions Group

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

Political Correctness is FASCISM Pretending to be Manners

So... a person can’t use the term "Negro" (Noun) or "Black," which is racism, discrimination, prejudice,  and bigotry! Yet an African-American can use it in a song every 3 seconds and it is played on the radio and TV that is ok?

So... a person can’t use the term "Aboriginal" (Not the Slang: Abo)– That too is racist and discriminatory. It is now Indigenous Australians!

Gay marriage is 'Banned in Australia' but we also are not allow to use the words lesbian/transvestite/gay (it is now LGBT)  Yet, how is this less discriminatory than not being able to marry who you love because of being a lesbian, transvestite or gay …???

We are being encouraged by our media to not use the word "Muslim" anymore because it may hurt someone’s religious feelings, yet all the experts that are behind the keyboards and on TV and in the media, would prefer us to use the term “Terrorism.” How can that be more acceptable?

So... as a journalist, how do I write up: 'A white man that walked into a mosque at prayer time, detonating a device, which injures, disables, disfigures and also annihilates the place taking out people that are just praying while on their mats;' - whilst still being nondiscriminatory and politically correct?

A Facebooker replied to the question this way:
“Life as we know it in Australia is coming to abrupt halt thanks to mentally scarred gay, lesbian, indigenous, one-legged, PTSD riddled, bleeding hearts, insisting on political correctness, while hard-working, struggling families pay taxes to support them (currently 1 person on welfare to each single working taxpayer) & having to suffer the wrath of a country going down the chute while grandstanding pollies invite every despot to take the jobs away from those who are working.“

 We can all see this happening, but can the media actually help restore sanity, rather than continue to perpetuate the problems? There is a way. Let's stick with our above example to illustrate.

As I see it, the technical term for anyone who kills another human, not in self-defense or whilst defending their families/property, is a "MURDERER" - regardless of religion, colour, sexual-orientation or gender. A terrorist is just a "MURDERER" plain and simple.

They should ban the words "terrorism" and "terrorist" and therby stop giving terrorism free publicity, which is what they are seeking. Then TERRORISM WOULD STOP over night. (And the newspapers and governments could no longer profit from it!)

In fact, whilst we are at it, ban all adjectives from use in all journalism - then the news would read very similar this:

"A person walked into a mosque at prayer time and detonated a device, that killed 3 and injured 24 others. At 2.22pm on Friday the 4th, the Middleville mosque was bombed whilst people were praying while on their mats. The murderer was a man with mental health issues and of the same religious denomination as those praying. A memorial service will be held at the same location on the 6th for the deceased."

This type of journalism is of no political or terrorist value, saves trees,
and does not glamorize the crime to those who are suggestible, weak-willed, weak-minded copy cats.

Wednesday, 19 April 2017

The Demise and Despising of the Word "Cunt"

How did "KUNTI" the name of a powerful Goddess from both Scandinavian traditions and the Hindu faiths, become the most shocking word in the English language?

She was also a high goddess in other belief systems:
  • Kunti was the matriarch of the Bhagavad Gita, the aunt of Krishna and the mother of 4 avatars. 
  • Kuntzig (German - meaning 'future') Gullveig (Norse) became a völva, (a powerful female shaman and seer in Norse religion) after being burnt and reborn 3 times. Each time being reborn more powerful. (Interestingly the Völva were women who travel across the land offering their their skills to assist a household. It appears that their coming was a great event, and effort was made to ensure they were welcome. These powerful women could commune with the spirits and had the power to influence a person's fate and luck. So Volva, a technical term for a woman's vagina is also derived from a sacred word)
  • Cunda, is the mother of Buddha according to Zen Japanese tradition.
  • Kun, the Sumeria Goddess of Mercy. ‘Cuneiform’ which can be translated to ‘the sign of the kunta’ or ‘queen who invented writing’. Cuneiform is one of the earliest known forms of writing in Sumeria dating at c.3100 BC. and was used by the priestesses of Inana for accounting.
  • Quani, is a Korean goddess.
  • Qudshu, is the female priestess of ancient Canaanites in Phoenicia
  • Quadesha, is the Sumerian word for a type of priestess.
  • Kunti is also the root word of the term kundalini (sacral energy)  
  • Cunti-Devi, Goddess of kundalini energy.
Kunta, means literally female genitalia which, translated into the Middle English, is 'queene' and 'quene', and the modern English 'quean' and 'queen'. 'Qu' can also mean love, sensuality, sexuality, the divinity present in all females. The Norwegian 'kone'  meaning 'wife,' shows an interesting variant form, related to the 'ku' and 'cu' feminine prefixes which spread through the Germanic and English tongues.

The Sullying of the Goddess
The answer to how this illustrious title became sullied is simple and sad.

Jehovah, the god of the old testament, had a wife originally called Asherah - who was worshiped in the high places of Kunti. The late Hebrew judge Hezekiah decided to remove the worshipers of the high places as they were more popular than Jehovah's. Hezekiah is reputed to have screamed at the scribes: - 
"Get that Kunt out of here." as he was ordering them to remove all references to her in the old testament. After which the state religion became a patriarchy and the kunts (the worshipers of the female at the high places) were despised.

We see the demonizing of... Asherah, the wife of Yehweh/Jehovah god during the reign of Hezekiah. (715 -686BC) She was a form of the Shikina and
Asherah the Wife of Jehovah
Sophia/Wisdom (Proverbs 8:22-31) the archetypal mother and wife, her’s was the hieros-gamos, around which the biblical imagery of the sacred marriage is drawn. As a spirit of nature she was worshiped in groves, at magnificent old trees and high places. It is from her name we get the word academy, which literally means 'to meet for study at a grove.' Her epithet "She Who Walks on the Sea" indicates the belief that she was the breath that parted the Red Sea. 

The inscription “Berakhti etkhem l’YHVH Shomron ul’Asherato” which translates as, “I have blessed you by Yahweh of Samaria and Asherah,” has been found many times, mostly at Kuntillet Ajrud, A centre of Asherah worship. The word Kunta is ancient Sumerian for ‘woman’ and ‘female genitalia,’ from which we get the demonized expletive word ‘cunt.’ This shows that Hezekiah did a very thorough job of demonizing Asherah and all that is feminine and divine. What was once a divine term is now the most repellent of words and the the wife of god became merely a cunt!

Hezekiah eradicated Asherah’s worship and removed references from her in the holy texts in an attempt to unify his nation against Assyria. She was too similar to the Assyrian goddess Ishtar/Innana and her name was too similar to their High god Ashur. During this time, the Assyrian King Sennacherib, whose name means 'the god Sin (the main Assyrian deity) has replaced the others,' had already successfully supplanted the Babylonian pantheon with his own and had begun conflict with the Israelites. Asherah’s reputation was another casualty of ancient war propaganda.
Extract from "Demonology" by Dr. S. D'Montford-  page 39

Do They Deserve The "C' Word?
So the next time you think of calling someone or something a cunt out of spite, question whether or not they are worthy. Do they deserve to be associated with the wife of god, the Great Queen, the sacred yoni (vulva) of the Uni-verse.

Monday, 27 February 2017

What is the Relationship Between Paganism and Violence?

In the last 100 years more people have died as a result of violent aggression than have in ALL preceding recorded history - mostly because of non-Pagan, religious land grab wars which victimize whole countries and involve total populations. Therefore, it is actually easier to write an article on Paganism and Peace, than Paganism and violence.
It is actually easier to write an article on Paganism and Peace
Define Violence
In a time where there was no police force - people had to be responsible for their own defense. All lives, black white and brindle, mattered and justice was a community agreement. Previous to the establishment of the first Christian empire in the 3rd century AD by Constantine, the majority of people did not live in urban buildup therefore the vast majority of people on the planet lived peaceful agrarian lives untouched by war and violence. Hence violent aggression is not more evident in past -in fact far less so than now.

Lots of evidence to suggest ancient societies fought battles between teams of elite volunteer soldiers only, which avoided involving the majority of an area's citizenry and left the majority of the males (women and children) free to produce the means of living and more young. These battles were by in large border skirmishes or tribute disputes. The ageing population lived to 70+ years, which is on par with us today. Ageing populations can only be maintained in peaceful societies where enough of the young exist to care for the elders.

Pagan = Pacifist
The word “Pagan”  was originally a Roman insult for a country dweller, (Like our term Red-Neck) This insult was used as a put down to discourage those who sort a loophole to get out of conscribed military service. Pagans   used their worship of many gods to avowing doing military service and killing people and there by killing people. Originally it was a term used to denote what we today might call a pacifist. To combat his trend, Rome did not outlaw the worship of indigenous god - it encouraged the ambitious to abandon their "ignorant Pagan” path and only keep the official "refined Roman" religious celebrations. The Pagan desire to avoid military service by their employing their polytheistic loop hole holy-days (holidays) may have been the Roman motivation for adopting the militarized styled Christian faith with only 2 major celebrations per year.

It is ironic that although Christian civilization brought about a widespread lessening of the value of life and the horrors of religious wars  that correlates well to the significantly shorter life expectancy.  From Roman times,  pro-pagan-da   has been utilised to to convince the masses that Pagans ignorant and violent. This propaganda  continued to be utilised very successfully by the post roman Christian theocracy. 

Human Sacrifice = A Biblical Practice - Not Pagan
Christian Religions have pushed the idea that Pagan societies practiced human sacrifice. Yet, no physical evidence exists of this and the rare cases that are sited historical propaganda are sited as exceptions and as shocking.

Yet the truth is that human sacrifice was fundamental to and especially prevalent in the Bible. The Old Testament is all overtly about human sacrifice - Jesus became god's ultimate human sacrifice in the New Testament who taught his disciples to sacrifice themselves like lambs to the slaughter. Therefore, the whole bible and all of its related religions are about human sacrifice. I have seen so may museum exhibits where they are far too quick to encourage the use of the word "sacrifice" in relation to Pagan practices rather than of more obvious alternatives. That's Academics for you I'm afraid , they each interpret evidence as they perceive it or according to the political agenda that will advance them through the academic ranks the fastest.  Yet, there are unsolved archaeological enigma surrounds the grizzly finds at excavations of the Neolithic Villages of Herxheim in Modern day Germany. Yet few consider the obvious alternative that these and and the Scandinavian the bog men are far more likely to disgraced executed criminals. I have seen so may museum exhibits where they are far too quick to encourage the use of the word "sacrifice" in stead of more obvious alternatives. Some uncovered funerary rites that involved cannibalism. Cannibalism did exist in many cultures more as a way to express dominance over enemies than because of a need for food. Even some Australian Aboriginal language groups were cannibalistic too, surprisingly, the matriarchal ones like the Wirradigree. A translation of the Maori battle chant the Haka reveals this over cannibalism too

Ka mate! Ka mate! Ka ora! Ka ora!

I die!      I die!       I live!   I live!
Ka mate! Ka mate! Ka ora! Ka ora!
I die!      I die!       I live!   I live!
Tenei te tangata puhuru huru
This is the hairy man
Nana nei i tiki mai
Who fetched the Sun
Whakawhiti te ra
And caused it to shine again
A upa … ne!          ka upa … ne!
One upward step! Another upward step!
A upane kaupane whiti te ra!
An upward step, another.. the Sun shines!!
Ha La Ha (tongue out)
I will eat you all up

Pagans Make Much Less War Compared to People of Abrahamic Faiths. 
Pagan warrior culture are fascinating. The ethics of the vast majority of earth based Pagan cultures world wide past and present, is defense of home hearth and children. Conquering, wars and aggression was not - Sure we have the Viking/Greek raids in their need for arable land - But violent conquest, domination and destruction of any other civilization was not their aim - They were stealing to feed their families - Many times the Greeks/And Vikings were paid off so they did not attack - And they were happy with it. It was not the love of violence for violence sake as is portrayed in the popular media. They were business men and they both had true democratic governments. 

However, the conquest and the inquisitions and the dominance sort by "the people of the book" is based upon violence and child sacrifice - The whole bible is a political document that devised domination and control of nations through the use of child sacrifices. The book of "Judges" in the bible, documents god's plan for systematic genocide in the name of the angry, jealous, hateful, mountain god Jehovah, who promised Abraham real-estate he didn't own for perpetual child sacrifices forever of (the first born of every man, beast and fowl under Abraham's care and his descendants into eternity- Jewish, Christian and Islam - The whole terrorism thing arises from this age old conflict as to who has the right to be the genuine sacrifice - and neither society is willing to reject that level of indoctrinated violence as unethical (and down right stupid)
The Buddhists(the Catholics of the east) practiced child sacrifice until the 20 century. Each new Tibetan Buddhist temple had a small casket buried under its corner foundation stone so that the spirit of the child would become the temple’s guardian spirit. It was the Tibetan Buddhists that backed/pushed Ghengis and Attila in their invasion into the west and Scandinavia - Ponder that even though Hitler had deeply held Pagan beliefs it was over ridden politically by the Catholic Church that pushed his empire's establishment claiming it to be the 'Reich of the 1000 year reign of Christ' - and the Tibetan Buddhists jumped on board with this lauding him as the prophesied Matraiya.

So whilst the basis of modern Christian society is fear of torture and bullying by the emissary of the angry, jealous mountain god - Pagan ethics taught individual empowerment, strength and noble right actions in defense and preservation of family and honor - even challenging, questioning defeating the Gods if they behaved in an overly violent or less than noble way 
Boudicca queen of the British Celtic Iceni tribe who led an uprising against the occupying forces of the Roman Empire in AD 60, who had killed her husband and raped her daughters

Please refer to Shé D'Montford's articles on Pagan Ethics and Pagan Orgins in 
"Who's Afraid of the Big Bag Witch"

Physical Evidence Proves the Fundamental Dishonesty of Climate Change Propaganda

Massive 2000  year old tree remains with running sap, that have thawed from glaciers show that the basis of the climate change theories are fundamentally flawed.
Receding glaciers in Alaska that tore trees in half and then froze the stumps  reveal those old remnants of a warmer era. I like these little “concrete” anecdotes, though their true meaning depends on exactly how old these remains are, and whether that timing correlates with warming in other places.

The retreat of the Mendenhall Glacier reveals the remains of trees which grew more than 2,000 years ago. These ancient forests that have remained frozen beneath the ice for up to 2,350 years. The most recent stumps have been dated by Proff Connor and other researchers as emerging from the Mendenhall are between 1,400 and 1,200 years old. The oldest she’s tested are around 2,350 years old. She’s also dated some at around 1,870 to 2,000 years old. They’ve also documented the glacial advance between 1724 and 1794 A.D. that pushed Huna Tlingit off their land, and written a paper incorporating those cultural and geographic histories. In that paper they cite Tlingit histories recorded by Richard and Nora Dauenhauer as saying that glacier was growing and advancing “faster than a running dog.” 
 The Many remains of frozen humas as well as trees shows that this global cooling happened very quicky and was deadly
Some of the ages of these trees suggest the Roman Warm Period may have occurred at the same time as an Alaskan Warm Period. Evidently, polar bears survived.) These particular tree stumps are a bit too early to tie in with Medieval warm times in Europe. Though, like other places, the glaciers started receding 200 years ago, long before man-made CO2 started to rise.

Receding Swiss glaciers inconveniently reveal 4000 year old forests – and make it clear that glacier retreat is nothing new

Dr. Christian Schlüchter’s discovery of 4,000-year-old chunks of wood at the leading edge of a Swiss glacier was clearly not cheered by many members of the global warming doom-and-gloom science orthodoxy.

This finding indicated that the Alps were pretty nearly glacier-free at that time, disproving accepted theories that they only began retreating after the end of the little ice age in the mid-19th century. As he concluded, the region had once been much warmer than today, with “a wild landscape and wide flowing river.”

Dr. Schlüchter’s report might have been more conveniently dismissed by the entrenched global warming establishment were it not for his distinguished reputation as a giant in the field of geology and paleoclimatology who has authored/coauthored more than 250 papers and is a professor emeritus at the University of Bern in Switzerland.

Then he made himself even more unpopular thanks to a recent interview titled “Our Society is Fundamentally Dishonest” which appeared in the Swiss publication Der Bund where he criticized the U.N.-dominated institutional climate science hierarchy for extreme tunnel vision and political contamination.

Following the ancient forest evidence discovery Schlüchter became a target of scorn. As he observes in the interview, “... My findings thus caught many experts off guard”
 Lots of other evidence exists that there is really nothing new about dramatic glacier advances and retreats. Schlüchter points out that “the forest line was much higher than it is today; there were hardly any glaciers. Nowhere in the detailed travel accounts from Roman times are glaciers mentioned.”
Schlüchter criticizes his critics for focusing on a time period which is “indeed too short.” His studies and analyses of a Rhone glacier area reveal that “the rock surface had [previously] been ice-free 5,800 of the last 10,000 years.”

Distinct solar imprint on climate
What’s more worrisome, Schlüchter’s findings show that cold periods can strike very rapidly. Near the edge of Mont Miné Glacier his team found huge tree trunks and discovered that they all had died in just a single year. The scientists were stunned. That finding, Schlüchter states, confirmed that the sun is the main driver in climate change. 

Today’s “rapid” changes are nothing new
He casts doubt on the UN projection that the Alps will be almost glacier-free by 2100, reminding us that “the system is extremely dynamic and doesn’t function linearly” and that “extreme, sudden changes have clearly been seen in the past“. History’s record is unequivocal on this. Schlüchter also doesn’t view today’s climate warming as anything unusual, and poses a number of unanswered questions:
  • Why did the glaciers retreat in the middle of the 19th century, although the large CO2 increase in the atmosphere came later? 
  • Why did the earth ‘tip’ in such a short time into a warming phase? 
  • Why did glaciers again advance in 1880s, 1920s and 1980s? 
Sooner or later climate science will have to answer the question why the retreat of the glacier at the end of the Little Ice Age around 1850 was so rapid.”

On science: “Our society is fundamentally dishonest”
CO2 fails to answer many open questions. Already we get the sense that hockey stick climate claims are turning out to be rather sorrowful and unimaginative wives’ tales. He summarizes on the refusal to acknowledge the reality of our past: “Our society in fundamentally dishonest“.